<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why do IT Operations suck?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thehotaisle.com/2008/09/05/why-do-it-operations-suck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thehotaisle.com/2008/09/05/why-do-it-operations-suck/</link>
	<description>Fresh Thinking on IT Operations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:42:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nybbles for the end of the week &#171; The NetWorker Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.thehotaisle.com/2008/09/05/why-do-it-operations-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-7254</link>
		<dc:creator>Nybbles for the end of the week &#171; The NetWorker Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehotaisle.com/?p=20#comment-7254</guid>
		<description>[...] Why do IT operations suck? An insightful article by Steve O&#8217;Donnell. Steve asks why our staff who have primary involvement with systems 24&#215;7 (operators) are often the least skilled, least trained and least paid. (As a consultant, I&#8217;ve frequently experienced companies who consider it a waste of time to properly train operators, and as a result their systems usually suffer for it.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why do IT operations suck? An insightful article by Steve O&#8217;Donnell. Steve asks why our staff who have primary involvement with systems 24&#215;7 (operators) are often the least skilled, least trained and least paid. (As a consultant, I&#8217;ve frequently experienced companies who consider it a waste of time to properly train operators, and as a result their systems usually suffer for it.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Why does our Data Center Operations groups so often disappoint us and our clients? &#124; The Hot Aisle -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thehotaisle.com/2008/09/05/why-do-it-operations-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-7252</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Why does our Data Center Operations groups so often disappoint us and our clients? &#124; The Hot Aisle -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 07:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehotaisle.com/?p=20#comment-7252</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by K Kopec, Israel Mendoza, Steve O&#039;Donnell, Caleb Bontrager, Preston de Guise and others. Preston de Guise said: RT @stephenodonnell Blog] Why do IT Operations Suck? http://bit.ly/86idzJ &lt;-- Great analysis of ops issues! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by K Kopec, Israel Mendoza, Steve O&#39;Donnell, Caleb Bontrager, Preston de Guise and others. Preston de Guise said: RT @stephenodonnell Blog] Why do IT Operations Suck? <a href="http://bit.ly/86idzJ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/86idzJ</a> &lt;&#8211; Great analysis of ops issues! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So your IT Operations suck, what can you do? &#124; The Hot Aisle</title>
		<link>http://www.thehotaisle.com/2008/09/05/why-do-it-operations-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>So your IT Operations suck, what can you do? &#124; The Hot Aisle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehotaisle.com/?p=20#comment-45</guid>
		<description>[...] reasons that we monitor and manage IT in technical silos earlier in the article on this Website:- Why do IT Operations suck? It’s worth a read [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reasons that we monitor and manage IT in technical silos earlier in the article on this Website:- Why do IT Operations suck? It’s worth a read [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.thehotaisle.com/2008/09/05/why-do-it-operations-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 22:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehotaisle.com/?p=20#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve,

Firstly, welcome to the blogging world. I sincerely hope you keep up this sort of output. Its superb.

One thing I wanted to share with you was the story of a helpdesk implementation we rolled-out for UK hosting company who were outsourcing the bulk of their operation to a Contact Center  Serbia.

We conducted a Customer Experience audit and found that a significant number of people contacting the helpdesk were web developers and freelance technologists who were both reselling   and acting as mavens for a critical new service (at the time one of the first hosted Exchange Services in the UK).

We profiled them and found that they were both very technically knowledgeable and typically contacted the helpdesk only after expending considerable effort trying to solve their problems themselves.

These vital customers hated getting script reading support agents on the phone. They were being forced to describe a complex problem to people who did not understand the issues and whose main job was to register the issue and add it to the list of issues to be  escalated &quot;up&quot; to the sort people who were the developer&#039;s  technical peers.

Our solution to this proved to extremely successfully. We simply inverted the classic support pyramid. Instead of having our least knowledgeable people in the first line, we put our system administrators on the phones. They triaged incoming issues, passing down low level support tasks (like mailbox configuration) to juniors whilst giving immediate attention to serious issues.

Where necessary, the issues was passed to the NOC engineering team, but it had been captured and described by an administrator and most importantly the customer knew they were dealing with highly skilled and knowledgeable &quot;agents&quot; who immediately understood their issues as peers. We also delighted customers by caring about the same thing they did and proving it by providing them with technical equals to support them.

Of course part of the reason were able to do this was because this was an outsourced implementation. We were able to hire truly brilliant Exchange administrators in Serbia for the price of trainee secretary in the UK. I believe that this is one of the the main customer experience benefits from correctly implemented outsourcing: Operational and Excellence delivered live. Customers love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve,</p>
<p>Firstly, welcome to the blogging world. I sincerely hope you keep up this sort of output. Its superb.</p>
<p>One thing I wanted to share with you was the story of a helpdesk implementation we rolled-out for UK hosting company who were outsourcing the bulk of their operation to a Contact Center  Serbia.</p>
<p>We conducted a Customer Experience audit and found that a significant number of people contacting the helpdesk were web developers and freelance technologists who were both reselling   and acting as mavens for a critical new service (at the time one of the first hosted Exchange Services in the UK).</p>
<p>We profiled them and found that they were both very technically knowledgeable and typically contacted the helpdesk only after expending considerable effort trying to solve their problems themselves.</p>
<p>These vital customers hated getting script reading support agents on the phone. They were being forced to describe a complex problem to people who did not understand the issues and whose main job was to register the issue and add it to the list of issues to be  escalated &#8220;up&#8221; to the sort people who were the developer&#8217;s  technical peers.</p>
<p>Our solution to this proved to extremely successfully. We simply inverted the classic support pyramid. Instead of having our least knowledgeable people in the first line, we put our system administrators on the phones. They triaged incoming issues, passing down low level support tasks (like mailbox configuration) to juniors whilst giving immediate attention to serious issues.</p>
<p>Where necessary, the issues was passed to the NOC engineering team, but it had been captured and described by an administrator and most importantly the customer knew they were dealing with highly skilled and knowledgeable &#8220;agents&#8221; who immediately understood their issues as peers. We also delighted customers by caring about the same thing they did and proving it by providing them with technical equals to support them.</p>
<p>Of course part of the reason were able to do this was because this was an outsourced implementation. We were able to hire truly brilliant Exchange administrators in Serbia for the price of trainee secretary in the UK. I believe that this is one of the the main customer experience benefits from correctly implemented outsourcing: Operational and Excellence delivered live. Customers love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
