<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why legacy thinking costs performance, reliability and cash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thehotaisle.com/2009/06/02/why-legacy-thinking-costs-performance-reliability-and-cash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thehotaisle.com/2009/06/02/why-legacy-thinking-costs-performance-reliability-and-cash/</link>
	<description>Fresh Thinking on IT Operations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Legacy Thinking Costs Performance, Reliability, and Cash &#171; Enterprise Strategy Group</title>
		<link>http://www.thehotaisle.com/2009/06/02/why-legacy-thinking-costs-performance-reliability-and-cash/comment-page-1/#comment-7183</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Legacy Thinking Costs Performance, Reliability, and Cash &#171; Enterprise Strategy Group</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 20:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehotaisle.com/?p=1397#comment-7183</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the entire blog entry here &gt;&gt; All views and opinions expressed in ESG blog posts are intended to be those of the post&#039;s author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc., or its clients. ESG bloggers do not and will not engage in any form of paid-for blogging. Click to see our complete Disclosure Policy. For important information about using this content, please review our Terms &amp; Conditions    Tags: ac power, airflow, articles, data center, feature, IT Operations, maintenance, opinion, problems, raised floor, SAN, Servers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the entire blog entry here &gt;&gt; All views and opinions expressed in ESG blog posts are intended to be those of the post&#39;s author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc., or its clients. ESG bloggers do not and will not engage in any form of paid-for blogging. Click to see our complete Disclosure Policy. For important information about using this content, please review our Terms &amp; Conditions    Tags: ac power, airflow, articles, data center, feature, IT Operations, maintenance, opinion, problems, raised floor, SAN, Servers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sjoerd van Groning</title>
		<link>http://www.thehotaisle.com/2009/06/02/why-legacy-thinking-costs-performance-reliability-and-cash/comment-page-1/#comment-1547</link>
		<dc:creator>Sjoerd van Groning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehotaisle.com/?p=1397#comment-1547</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t get me started on the airflow in alot of switching and routing equipment. With servers at least we work with a cold and warm isle which is kinda efficient,pulling cold air in at the front and blowing it out on the back. Who did ever come up with a side to side airflow. And why are some switche left-right and some right-left. Aargh. Do the designers have any idea that their equipment is 19&quot; because it will be put in a cabinet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#39;t get me started on the airflow in alot of switching and routing equipment. With servers at least we work with a cold and warm isle which is kinda efficient,pulling cold air in at the front and blowing it out on the back. Who did ever come up with a side to side airflow. And why are some switche left-right and some right-left. Aargh. Do the designers have any idea that their equipment is 19&#8243; because it will be put in a cabinet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noshow</title>
		<link>http://www.thehotaisle.com/2009/06/02/why-legacy-thinking-costs-performance-reliability-and-cash/comment-page-1/#comment-1546</link>
		<dc:creator>noshow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehotaisle.com/?p=1397#comment-1546</guid>
		<description>Steve,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think basically data centre design fails because each discipline does not know what the other disciplines are doing and each is going his merry way regardless. For instance we are seeing every greater equipment densities which need an ever greater amount of cooling, why ?  I think the economises have changed so that the cost of a data centre in £ per m² is not the important cost it’s the running costs so if you buy a big shed type building and space the kit out so its easier and more economical to cool. Why try to put more and more kit into small space ? It not going to make things more efficient .&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As I read the EU code of conduct on data centre efficiency, in pacticular the bit that says all new IT to be ETSI compliant by 2012. I wonder if anyone who is in a position to effect change  are looking to the future and if so why are people still building data centre dinosaurs !&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Steve C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>I think basically data centre design fails because each discipline does not know what the other disciplines are doing and each is going his merry way regardless. For instance we are seeing every greater equipment densities which need an ever greater amount of cooling, why ?  I think the economises have changed so that the cost of a data centre in £ per m² is not the important cost it’s the running costs so if you buy a big shed type building and space the kit out so its easier and more economical to cool. Why try to put more and more kit into small space ? It not going to make things more efficient .</p>
<p>As I read the EU code of conduct on data centre efficiency, in pacticular the bit that says all new IT to be ETSI compliant by 2012. I wonder if anyone who is in a position to effect change  are looking to the future and if so why are people still building data centre dinosaurs !</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Steve C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Crawford</title>
		<link>http://www.thehotaisle.com/2009/06/02/why-legacy-thinking-costs-performance-reliability-and-cash/comment-page-1/#comment-8988</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehotaisle.com/?p=1397#comment-8988</guid>
		<description>Steve,

I think basically data centre design fails because each discipline does not know what the other disciplines are doing and each is going his merry way regardless. For instance we are seeing every greater equipment densities which need an ever greater amount of cooling, why ?  I think the economises have changed so that the cost of a data centre in £ per m² is not the important cost it’s the running costs so if you buy a big shed type building and space the kit out so its easier and more economical to cool. Why try to put more and more kit into small space ? It not going to make things more efficient .

As I read the EU code of conduct on data centre efficiency, in pacticular the bit that says all new IT to be ETSI compliant by 2012. I wonder if anyone who is in a position to effect change  are looking to the future and if so why are people still building data centre dinosaurs !

Cheers

Steve C
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>I think basically data centre design fails because each discipline does not know what the other disciplines are doing and each is going his merry way regardless. For instance we are seeing every greater equipment densities which need an ever greater amount of cooling, why ?  I think the economises have changed so that the cost of a data centre in £ per m² is not the important cost it’s the running costs so if you buy a big shed type building and space the kit out so its easier and more economical to cool. Why try to put more and more kit into small space ? It not going to make things more efficient .</p>
<p>As I read the EU code of conduct on data centre efficiency, in pacticular the bit that says all new IT to be ETSI compliant by 2012. I wonder if anyone who is in a position to effect change  are looking to the future and if so why are people still building data centre dinosaurs !</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Steve C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

