<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The weakest link</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thehotaisle.com/2009/09/16/the-weakest-link/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thehotaisle.com/2009/09/16/the-weakest-link/</link>
	<description>Fresh Thinking on IT Operations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The weakest link &#171; Enterprise Strategy Group</title>
		<link>http://www.thehotaisle.com/2009/09/16/the-weakest-link/comment-page-1/#comment-7150</link>
		<dc:creator>The weakest link &#171; Enterprise Strategy Group</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehotaisle.com/?p=1565#comment-7150</guid>
		<description>[...] I just picked up a neat blog post by Martin Glassborow (@storagebod) discussing a double disk failure in a RAID 5 array which (apparently) caused lost data. RAID is Redundant Array of Independent Disks and the number refers to the type of protection offered. RAID 5 means that there is an extra disks in the group [...]  Read the entire blog entry here &gt;&gt; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I just picked up a neat blog post by Martin Glassborow (@storagebod) discussing a double disk failure in a RAID 5 array which (apparently) caused lost data. RAID is Redundant Array of Independent Disks and the number refers to the type of protection offered. RAID 5 means that there is an extra disks in the group [...]  Read the entire blog entry here &gt;&gt; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.thehotaisle.com/2009/09/16/the-weakest-link/comment-page-1/#comment-2113</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehotaisle.com/?p=1565#comment-2113</guid>
		<description>I feel for this guy .. A very bad day at the office indeed. I certainly would not like to sit next to him on a plane! In this case, if it was a key business system, you would hope that DR protection could be invoked and have live switch to a DR site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel for this guy .. A very bad day at the office indeed. I certainly would not like to sit next to him on a plane! In this case, if it was a key business system, you would hope that DR protection could be invoked and have live switch to a DR site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

