<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why storage will inevitably migrate to flash and trash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thehotaisle.com/2010/01/31/why-storage-will-inevitably-migrate-to-flash-and-trash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thehotaisle.com/2010/01/31/why-storage-will-inevitably-migrate-to-flash-and-trash/</link>
	<description>Fresh Thinking on IT Operations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:42:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy Sparkes</title>
		<link>http://www.thehotaisle.com/2010/01/31/why-storage-will-inevitably-migrate-to-flash-and-trash/comment-page-1/#comment-7267</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Sparkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehotaisle.com/?p=1896#comment-7267</guid>
		<description>Yes you are right, but its going to take awhile The cross over point is probably in the 2015-17 timeframe where SSD&#039;s will become the defacto choice. Another interesting thing to consider is whats happening to I/O in different parts of the datapath. I think disk I/O is advancing at around 20% of capacity and if you examine whats happening to network I/O a similar picture of asymmetry appears. Therefore you are also seeing the whole memory hierachry is changing with SSD&#039;s effectively extending the cache layer and then thngs can get really interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes you are right, but its going to take awhile The cross over point is probably in the 2015-17 timeframe where SSD&#8217;s will become the defacto choice. Another interesting thing to consider is whats happening to I/O in different parts of the datapath. I think disk I/O is advancing at around 20% of capacity and if you examine whats happening to network I/O a similar picture of asymmetry appears. Therefore you are also seeing the whole memory hierachry is changing with SSD&#8217;s effectively extending the cache layer and then thngs can get really interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Power characteristics of disk technology will drive adoption of flash and SATA &#124; The Hot Aisle -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thehotaisle.com/2010/01/31/why-storage-will-inevitably-migrate-to-flash-and-trash/comment-page-1/#comment-7265</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Power characteristics of disk technology will drive adoption of flash and SATA &#124; The Hot Aisle -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehotaisle.com/?p=1896#comment-7265</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Steve O&#039;Donnell, C M Norton, Sam Routledge, Song Ma, ESG and others. ESG said: RT @stephenodonnell: [Blog] : Why storage will inevitably migrate to flash and trash http://bit.ly/c4M1vT #datacentre #it #esg [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Steve O&#39;Donnell, C M Norton, Sam Routledge, Song Ma, ESG and others. ESG said: RT @stephenodonnell: [Blog] : Why storage will inevitably migrate to flash and trash <a href="http://bit.ly/c4M1vT" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/c4M1vT</a> #datacentre #it #esg [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
